Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Anupam Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of UP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of cost waiver ia as infructuous. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. suo-motu cognizance on rainwater harvesting complaint. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. shallow water table negates recharge structures need. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. committee recommends conservation, pond adoption, studies. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. compliance via structure conversion, ponds, afforestation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. no bitumen contamination per expert studies. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 24) |
| 7. no violation; directions for monitoring issued. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
ORDER
I.A. No. 201 of 2024
1. This Application has been filed on behalf of the Uttar Pradesh Expressway Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as ‘UPEIDA’) seeking waiver of cost of Rs. 25000/- imposed vide order dated 12.02.2024.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for UPEIDA stated that the cost has been deposited and this application has rendered infructuous, it is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Original Application No. 170 of 2022
3. The Original Application has been registered under Sections 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act, 2010’) in exercise of suo-motu jurisdic
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
