SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 5452

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Arun Kumar Tyagi, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Bharat Sehrawat – Appellant
Versus
Umesh Verma – Respondent
Original Application No. 09/2023 | I.A. No. 881/2023



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Applicant in person
For the Respondents:None for respondent no. 1, Mr. Muddassir Daiyyan for respondent no. 2, Ms. Kritika Gupta for respondent no. 3, Ms. Puja Kalra for respondent no. 4

NGT cannot allow withdrawal of environmental applications raising substantial public interest issues; must ensure full remedial restoration including plantation, beyond mere encroachment removal.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Sections 14, 15 - Environmental protection - Encroachment on designated green planter area - Applicant sought removal of encroachment and restoration - MCD removed encroachment but did not restore green area through plantation - Tribunal held that applications raising substantial environmental questions in public interest cannot be withdrawn even if applicant seeks withdrawal, as Tribunal must ensure remedial measures for environment protection - Absence of specific denial of original layout provisions amounts to admission - Directions issued for restoration by plantation. (Paras 13-18, 23)

(B) Public interest litigation - Withdrawal not permitted - Tribunal cannot dismiss environmental applications as withdrawn; must address substantial questions relating to environment with ameliorative measures, consistent with statutory obligations. (Paras 14-16)

Facts of the case:
Applicant alleged encroachment by ground floor flat owner on front and back green planter areas designated in original layout of category-III flats by removing plants, demolishing platforms, laying concrete flooring, and erecting boundary wall, depriving environmental services and compromising privacy/safety. Respondent denied encroachment, claimed original condition, and counter-alleged unauthorized upper floor construction by applicant. MCD confirmed encroachment via inspection, issued notices, and removed it during large-scale drive on 05.12.2023. Applicant then sought withdrawal as grievance addressed, but Tribunal rejected.

Findings of Court:
Encroachment verified and removed by MCD; original layout deemed to include green planters based on implied admission; restoration by plantation mandated within two months during monsoon, with compliance report in three months.

Issues: Whether applicant can withdraw environmental application after partial redressal; existence of green planter in original layout; adequacy of encroachment removal without restoration; need for remedial plantation.

Ratio Decidendi: Tribunal cannot permit withdrawal or dismiss as infructuous environmental applications involving public interest; must enforce restoration beyond mere removal to protect environment; non-denial implies admission of layout provisions.

Result: Application disposed with directions to MCD for green area restoration by plantation; withdrawal IA dismissed.

Table of Content
1. applicant's claim of green planter encroachment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. impleadment of parties and dda's response. (Para 4 , 5 , 8)
3. respondent's denial and counter-allegations of unauthorized construction. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10)
4. hearing and applicant's withdrawal request. (Para 11 , 12)
5. ngt cannot allow withdrawal of public interest environmental cases. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. encroachment confirmed; restoration of green area required. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. unauthorized construction outside ngt jurisdiction. (Para 22)
8. directions for mcd to restore green planter area. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)

Judgment

PRONOUNCED BY: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JM

1. The applicant-Mr. Bharat Sehrawat resident of Flat No. 4052, Sector C, Pocket 4, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, filed the present application under the provisions of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 seeking directions for removal of encroachment from and restoration of green planter area in front of DDA SFS Category –III Flats in Sector-C, Pocket 4, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi.

2. Briefly stated the applicant has submitted in the application that in the original layout DDA has made the provision of green area-planter in front of the above said flats. Dr. Umesh Verma, the owner of Flat No. 4050, Sector-C, Pocket 4, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi has encroached upon and removed platform of the green planter area, laid pucca concrete flooring and enclosed the same in his flat by building a concrete boundary wall around it in complete disregard of the Rules. The applicant and his family have been illegally deprived of the environmental services of green planter area and their privacy and personal safety has also been threatened by providing easy access for climbing to the balcony of the flat of the applicant.

3. The relevant part of the application enumerating grievances of the applicant reads as under:

“Sub: Complaint against removal of tree/plants and encroachment of mandatory Green area designated in the layout of DDA Built-up SFS Flats, Category-III X X X X On 27th October 2022, I purchased a DDA Built-up SFS Flat No. 4052, Category-III, in Sector C, Pocket-4, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070.

After noticing certain ground floor flats in our locality, I came to know that the original DDA layout had the provision for Green area - ’Planter’ for all the flats.

A picture of Green areas - Planters in front of three ground floor houses in my neighbourhood are attached as Annexure-I of my application, for kind reference.

I hereby register my complaint against the removal of tree/plants and encroachment of one such Green area - ’Planter’ by Dr. Umesh Verma, the owner of Flat No. 4050, Sector-C, Pocket-4, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. Dr. Umesh Verma is the owner of the ground floor flat under my first floor flat.

A picture of the same is attached as Annexure-II of my application, for kind reference.

As the owner of the first floor flat, my family and I are entitled to the right to the environment through the tree/plants raised on the DDA designated ’Green area’- Planter, in front of the balcony of my house.

The platform of ’Planter’ area has been removed and Pucca Concrete flooring has been done by Dr. Umesh Verma, while encroaching the public land designated as ’Green Area’ and enclosing the same in his house by building a concrete boundary wall around it.

In complete disregard of rules, Dr. Umesh Verma has brazenly removed the tree/plants, removed the platform, concretised the mandated green area and encroached upon the Government land. By doing this he has deprived me & my family of the right to life and environmental services.

Additionally, it poses a serious threat to my privacy and personal safety as the boundary wall on the encroached area provides easy access to any antisocial element to climb onto the balcony.

I request and plead Hon’ble NGT for the restitution of the environment by taking cognizance of the violation of the DDA designated ’Green area’ in front of my house a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top