Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, Chairperson, A. SENTHIL VEL, Expert Member, AFROZ AHMAD, Expert Member
Junaid Ayubi – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal challenges ec for yamuna sand mining. (Para 1 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. typographical errors in ec and lease dismissed. (Para 2 , 3 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. replenishment study mandatory under 2020 guidelines. (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. 2016 guidelines require annual replenishment assessment. (Para 16 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. ec invalid without replenishment; no interference post-study. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. appeal dismissed after replenishment compliance. (Para 32) |
ORDER
1. In this appeal filed under section 16 read with section 18 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the “NGT Act”) appellant has challenged the Environmental Clearance (EC) dated 29.01.2022 issued in favour of the respondent no. 5 (project proponent) for river bed sand mining in river Yamuna at village Jairampur Jagiri, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana.
2. The submission of learned Counsel for the appellant is that the EC has been granted for mining of boulder, gravel and sand and the EC contains the condition to carry out the replenishment study after starting the project which is not permissible. He submits that this issue is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
