Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, J, HON’BLE MR. ISHWAR SINGH, EM
Kirtikumar Sadashiv Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
Narmada Water Resource & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of narmada and shipra rivers. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. concerns of water pollution and its effects. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. previous legal considerations and orders. (Para 5 , 6 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. state of sewage management along narmada. (Para 9 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. regulatory obligations of state pollution control. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. measures to counter pollution discharge. (Para 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 7. government scrutiny and pressure on local authorities. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. final judgment and summary of directives. (Para 36) |
| 9. closure of the original application. (Para 37) |
ORDER
1. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the records.
2. River Narmadra and Shipra flowing from the State of Madhya Pradesh are known to be one of the most pious river in India, and life line for the fulfilment of the need of the water for survival of the human being and wildlife and all creatures in addition of use of the water for agricultural purposes. The importance of the rivers has been shown both in physical world and spiritual world in the above lines.
3. Issue raised in this application are encroachment, illegal construction, temporary or in permanent shape, raising the residential constr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
