SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 285

ORISSA HIGH COURT
JHARANA PAKHIRA – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA MOHAN PRAMANIK – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA NO.933 of 2023 In the matter of an application under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.

………………

Smt. Jharana Pakhira …. Appellant -versus-

Chandra Mohan Parmanik & …. Respondents Another For Appellant : M/s. B.B. Singh, P.B. Singh & N.

Panigrahi, Advocate For Respondent No.2: M/s. A.A. Khan, S.K. Mishra, S.K. Sahoo, J.P. Tripathy, Z.A. Khan and S. Mohanty, Advocate PRESENT:

THE HONBLE JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Hearing:20.03.2025 and Date of Judgment: 20.03.2025 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. Perused the office note. Since notice on Respondent No.3 has been duly served on her jointly living sister, notice against the said respondent is treated as sufficient.

3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

4. The present appeal has been filed inter alia challenging Judgment dtd.17.07.2023 so passed by the learned 3rd M.A.C.T, Balasore in MAC Case No.68 of 2021. The aid claim application was filed by the claimant-appellant seeking gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top