ORISSA HIGH COURT
JHARANA PAKHIRA – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA MOHAN PRAMANIK – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA NO.933 of 2023 In the matter of an application under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
………………
Smt. Jharana Pakhira …. Appellant -versus-
Chandra Mohan Parmanik & …. Respondents Another For Appellant : M/s. B.B. Singh, P.B. Singh & N.
Panigrahi, Advocate For Respondent No.2: M/s. A.A. Khan, S.K. Mishra, S.K. Sahoo, J.P. Tripathy, Z.A. Khan and S. Mohanty, Advocate PRESENT:
THE HONBLE JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Hearing:20.03.2025 and Date of Judgment: 20.03.2025 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Perused the office note. Since notice on Respondent No.3 has been duly served on her jointly living sister, notice against the said respondent is treated as sufficient.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
4. The present appeal has been filed inter alia challenging Judgment dtd.17.07.2023 so passed by the learned 3rd M.A.C.T, Balasore in MAC Case No.68 of 2021. The aid claim application was filed by the claimant-appellant seeking gr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.