ORISSA HIGH COURT
K.R.MOHAPATRA, J
M/S.DEEPAK STEEL AND POWER LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY – Respondent
K.R. Mohapatra, J.-
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Petitioner in this writ petition assails the initiation proceeding under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for brevity ‘the Act, 2002’) and consequential show cause notice dated 19th June, 2015 under Annexure-5. He further prays to keep the said proceeding in W.P.(C). No.14164 of 2015 abeyance till completion of trial in VGR No.05 of 2013 pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, (Vigilance), Keonjhar.
3 . Mr. Rath, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the initiation proceeding under Section 8 of the Act, 2002 is per se illegal as the Petitioner being an accused in the proceeding under the Act 2002 is compelled to disclose the sources of income, earning or assets, out of which or by means of which, he has acquired the property, provisionally attached. He can make such a disclosure only at the stage of recording of the statement of the accused. Trial under the Act, 2002 is continuing and it has not yet reached the stage of recording the accused statement. At this stage, if the Petitioner discloses his defence, it will be utilized against him to prove the charges, w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.