ORISSA HIGH COURT
RASHMI RANJAN PARIDA – Appellant
Versus
GYANENDRA JENA – Respondent
ORDER
08.04.2024 09. 1. Heard Mr. Das, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.
Dutta, learned counsel for respondent No.2 Insurance Company.
2. None appears for respondent No.1.
3. Instant appeal is filed by the claimant appellant challenging the quantum of compensation directed in MAC No.49 of 2019 by 3 rd Additional District Judge-cum-4 th MACT, Cuttack on the grounds stated therein.
4. Mr. Das, learned counsel for the claimant appellant referring to the calculation sheet as at Flag-B claims for enhancement of compensation by sum of Rs.8,87,520/- contending that the disability of the claimant should have been treated as 90% instead and while claiming so, he refers to the following decisions, such as, Mohan Soni Vrs. Ram Avtar Tomar & Others, 2012 (1) TAC 385 (SC) and Rekha Jain Vrs. National Insurance Company Limited 2013 (3) TAC 747 (SC). It is submitted that though the disability is held to be 75% but the functional disability should have been at 100% and if not 90% at least since the claimant appellant suffered amputation of his left leg and sustained loco-motor disability, which is permanent in nature.
5. O
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.