ORISSA HIGH COURT
SANJIT KUMAR NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
18.04.2024 Savitri Ratho, J. This application under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C. has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge (Special Court), Kuchinda in in Special G.R. Case No. 04 of 2023 which arises out of Kuchinda P.S. Case No. 95 of 2023, rejecting the application of the petitioner under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. to discharge him from all the offences. Page 2 of 11 2. The prosecution allegation in brief is that the victim passed +3 in the year 2012, where the petitioner was serving as a lecturer in zoology. Thereafter, she was employed by him in his coaching institute as a data entry operator. The accused took advantage of her while she was working there and against her wishes has shot videos and photographs and subsequently by using those has kept physical relationship with her against her wishes on a number of occasions. When her marriage was fixed in the year 2018, he threatened to make her photographs and videos viral, for which her marriage negotiations failed. Again, in the year 2023, when her marriage had been fixed, he threatened her and then sent photographs and videos of the i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.