ORISSA HIGH COURT
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra, J
KRISAN KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
BLAPL
Bail - NDPS Act - Section 20(b)(ii)(C) - The court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody since 07.07.2023, on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.35,000/- with one local solvent surety for the like amount, subject to certain conditions, considering the fact that the petitioner does not have any similar criminal antecedent and the period of custodial detention.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for regular bail relating to P.R. No.192 of 2023-24, corresponding to 2(a)CC Case No.111 of 2023, pending before the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Cuttack for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court, after hearing the arguments of the parties and considering the facts and materials on record, was inclined to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.35,000/- with one local solvent surety for the like amount, subject to certain conditions.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in the NDPS case pending against him.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the fact that the petitioner does not have any similar criminal antecedent and the period of custodial detention, and accordingly granted bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
Final Decision: The court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.35,000/- with one local solvent surety for the like amount, subject to certain conditions.
03.1.This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2.Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Opposite Party. Perused the materials placed before this Court.
3.The present bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the Petitioner for regular bail relating to P.R. No.192 of 2023-24, corresponding to 2(a)CC Case No.111 of 2023, pending before the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Cuttack for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act .
4.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2023. He further contended that the investigation has been completed and the final charge-sheet has been submitted. He also contended that however, the charge has been framed, the trial has not commenced. He also contended that the Page 1 of 3.
5.Learned counsel for the State on the other hand contended that the allegations made in the FIR are serious in nature. Learned counsel for the State opposed the release of the Petitioner in view of the nature and seriousness of allegation made against the Petitioner. Therefore, he submitted that the prayer for bail of the Petitioner be rejected at this juncture.
6.Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and on careful consideration of the surrounding facts as well as materials on record, and the fact that the Petitioner does not have any similar criminal antecedent, and the period of custodial detention, this Court is inclined to release the Petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.35,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five Thousand) with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court in seisin over the matter. Release of the Petitioner shall also be subject to following conditions:-i) The Petitioner shall also file an affidavit before the Trial Court indicating therein his residential details and other details like Aadhar No., Phone No. before the jurisdictional police station and the release of the Petitioner shall be subject to verification of the aforesaid details and such details as would be furnished by any relative of the Petitioner in the shape of an affidavit.
7.It is further directed that the bail granted to the Petitioner is subject to the condition that the court below shall verify whether the Petitioner is having any similar criminal antecedent. In the event it is found that the Petitioner is having any similar criminal antecedent, this bail order shall automatically stand revoked. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.
8.The BLAPL is, accordingly, disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.