SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 176

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MEENA NAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.21393 of 2023 In the matter of an application under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India.

------------------

Meena Naik …. Petitioner -versus-

1. State of Odisha …. Opposite Parties

2. Regional Chief Conservator of Forest, Bhawanipatna Circle, Kalahandi

3. Divisional Forest Officer, Kalahandi

4. Prakash Chandra Mishra

5. Kanhu Charan Tripathy

6. Tapan Kumar Behera For Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate For Opposite Parties : Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM:

JUSTICE V. NARASINGH DATE OF HEARING AND JUDGMENT : 12.02.2025 V. Narasingh, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the impugned order at Annexure-11 by which the Petitioner who was working as a Forest Guard belonging to SC category and a woman was denied promotion to the cadre of “Forester”.

The Petitioner consequentially assailed the promotion which according to the Petitioner erroneously given to Opposite parties 4 to 6 vide Annexure-6.

3. By order dated 07.11.2024, notices to the private Opposite Parties 5 to 6 have been held to be sufficient. So also the notice qua the Opposite Party No.4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top