2023 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 2154
ORISSA HIGH COURT
AMITA KUMARI JENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
WPC(OAC)/1195/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OAC) No.1195 of 2015
Amita Kumari Jena
….
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER
14.02.2023
02.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard Mr. P.K. Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. M.K.
Balabantaray, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the Opp.
Parties and Mr. S.K. Patra, learned counsel appearing for the
Accountant General.
3. The present writ petition has been filed with the following
prayer:-
“a) Set aside the order dated 7.1.2015 at Annxure-9 being
ultravirus to Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
b) Declare that the applicant is deemed to be continuing in
old O.C.S.(Pension) Rules, 1992 and entitled to all the
benefits under the said Old OCS Rules, 1992.
c) Issue any order/direction which would offered complete
relief to the applicant in the facts and circumstances of the
case.”
4. In course of hearing learned counsel for the Petitioner contended
that he may be permitted to ventilate her grievances before the O.P.
No. 3 seeking consideration of his grievance. Accordingly, it is
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
observed that if any such application is moved within a period of
three (3) weeks from today, the same shall be considered within a
further period of three (3) months.
5. It is further observed that while taking such a decision, the
decision of this Court rendered in the case of Anand Dash Vrs.
State of Odisha & Ors. shall be taken into consideration, if it is
applicable to the facts of the present case.
6. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Sneha