2023 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 5880
ORISSA HIGH COURT
B.R.SARANGI J, Murahari Sri Raman, J
DAMAN PRATIRODHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
WP(C)/9742/2006
Page 1 of 51
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
W.P(C) NO. 9742 OF 2006
In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227
of the Constitution of India.
---------------
Daman Pratirodha Mancha
..… Petitioner
-Versus-
State of Odisha and others
….. Opp. Parties
For petitioner : M/s. Prasanta Kumar Jena and
Deba Prasad Mohapatra,
Advocates.
For opp. parties : Mr. A.K. Mishra,
Addl. Government Advocate.
P R E S E N T:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Date of Hearing: 08.09.2023:: Date of Judgment: 15.09.2023
DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.
“Daman
Pratirodha
Mancha”,
an
unregistered association formed in the year 2003 with the
aim and objective to sponsor the cause of the tribals, dalits,
farmers, fishermen and weaker sections of the society, more
specifically the exploited down trodden sections residing in
AFR
Page 2 of 51
the State of Odisha in a democratic method, has filed this
writ petition with the following relief:-
“It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court
may graciously be pleased to admit the writ
petition,
and
after
hearing
the
parties
the
impugned notification dated 20.06.2006 Annexure-
2 may kindly be quashed and the petitioner
organization may kindly be allowed to function
freely independently as per its aims and objectives
and the opp. parties may kindly be restrained not
to interfere in the smooth functioning of the
petitioner-organization and may kindly co-operate
with the petitioner-organisation to fulfil its objects.”
2.
The factual matrix of the case, in a nutshell, is
that the petitioner-association since its formation has been
functioning
within
the
frame
work
of
the
Indian
Constitution by observing the democratic principles. It is
not a frontal organisation of any political party known in
whatsoever name it may be. The petitioner-association as
well as its members have strong faith, respect and honour
upon the Constitution of India and have been functioning
in a discipline and a democratic manner. As such, it puts
forth its grievances before the State Government in
connection with the land reforms, restoration of tribal lands
to the tribals, which are occupied by the non-tribals and
influential persons in scheduled areas, providing minimum
Page 3 of 51
wages to daily wage earners, stop the plundering of natural
resources that is serving the interests of multinationals and
monopoly big industrialists of the country, withdrawal of
CRPF from the scheduled areas who have been committing
atrocities on innocent tribals. Incorporating details of the
grievances, the petitioner-association as well as its
members and the public in the locality submitted a
memorandum appearing personally before the Chief
Minister of Odisha, who, after being fully convinced,
assured to the petitioner-association to solve these
problems gradually by mobilizing State machinery. During
the discussion it was felt that the grievances are genuine,
proper and just, for which quick action is required to be
taken to stall the discontentment, which may lead to
violation movement and may affect the sentiment of local
mob. As a consequence thereof, the petitioner-association
made door to door campaign to communicate this message
which ultimately improved the hope of the distress people.
2.1.
While the petitioner-association was functioning
for the wellbeing of the people, being encouraged by the
Page 4 of 51
Government of Odisha, more specifically by the active co-
operation of the Chief Minister of Odisha, all of a sudden
the State Government, vide Home Department notification
dated 20.06.2006, declared the petitioner-organisation as
an “Unlawful Association” vide S.R.O. No.352/2006 in its
Gazettee Notification No. 888 published on 23.06.2006. The
petitioner-association, as per the impugned notification has
been stated to be sub-serving the interest an