ORISSA HIGH COURT
HARIHAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
ABLAPL/16691/2022
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioner filed a bail application in connection with Paradip Model P.S. Case No.429 of 2022.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the Petitioner's counsel filed a memo stating that there was no apprehension of arrest and the Petitioner wished to withdraw the bail application with liberty to move the court later if necessary.
Issues: Whether the bail application should be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that since there was no apprehension of arrest and the Petitioner wished to withdraw the bail application, the application could be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to file an application if a fresh cause of action arose.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the bail application as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to file an application if a fresh cause of action arose.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.16691 of 2022
Harihar Mishra
…. Petitioner
Mr. Banshidhar Baug, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. M.K. Mohanty, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
ORDER
05.01.2023
01.
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner filed a memo in court today
stating therein that since there is no apprehension of arrest in
connection with Paradip Model P.S. Case No.429 of 2022, the
Petitioner wants to withdraw this bail application with liberty to
move this Court later, if necessary.
2. In such view of the matter, the ABLAPL is dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the Petitioner to file
application, if fresh cause of action arises.
( Chittaranjan Dash )
Judge
S.K. Parida
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.