SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 192

ORISSA HIGH COURT
NU VISTA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
BRUNDABAN BEHERA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK (In the matter of an application under Section 115 of the CPC, 1908)

NU Vista Ltd., erstwhile known as …. Petitioner M/s. Emami Cement Ltd. at Kalinga Nagar Industrial Complex, Jajpur -versus-

Brundaban Behera and others …. Opposite Parties Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. M. Agarwal, Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA Date of Hearing :28.01.2025 :: Date of Judgment :31.01.2025 A.C. Behera, J. This revision under Section 115 of the CPC, 1908 has been filed by the petitioner against the opposite parties challenging an order of rejection of its petition under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, 1908 for rejection of plaint of the plaintiffs in C.S. No.74 of 2021 passed on dated 20.12.2021 by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Jajpur Road in the District of Jajpur.

The petitioner of this writ petition is the defendant No.3, the opposite party Nos.1 & 2 of this revision are the plaintiffs and opposite party Nos.3 & 4 i.e. State and the Tahasildar, Danagadi of this revision are the defendant Nos.1 & 2 in the suit vide C.S. No.74 of 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top