SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 286

ORISSA HIGH COURT
GITANJALI DASH – Appellant
Versus
PUSKAR MAHAPATRA @ BULU – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.1046 of 2024 An appeal under Section-173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.

………………

Gitanjali Dash and Anr. …. Appellants -versus-

Puskar Mahapatra and Anr.

…. Respondents For Appellants : Mr. P.K. Mishra, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. A. Dash, Advocate PRESENT:

THE HONBLE JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Hearing:13.03.2025 & Date of Judgment: 13.03.2025 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Perused the tracking report. Since notice issued to respondent no.1 has been duly served, notice on Respondent No.1 is treated as sufficient.

3. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the impugned judgment dated 25.09.2024 passed by the learned District Judge- cum-1st MACT, Jagatsinghpur in MAC Case No.254 of 2021.

4. It is contended that the appellants-claimants seeking grant of compensation on account of death of their son in a road accident which took place on 02.01.2010, filed MAC Case No.254 of 2021 in the file of lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top