2023 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 10072
ORISSA HIGH COURT
R.K. PATTANAIK, J
BHIMA KHORA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
CRLMC/256/2023
Page 1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.256 of 2023
Bhima Khora and Another
….
Petitioners
Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Orissa
….
Opposite Party
Mr. Tapas Kumar Praharaj, SC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order
No.
ORDER
27.01.2023
01.
1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
counsel for the State opposite party.
2.
Prayer in the present case is for quashing of the order of
cognizance dated 9th June, 2021 passed T.R. Case No.31 of 2021
corresponding to Kakiriguma P.S. Case No.22 of 2021 pending in
the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge
(POCSCO), Act, Jeypore, Koraput on the grounds stated therein.
3.
A copy of the chargesheet is at Annexure-2.
4.
Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the petitioners are the parents of the principal accused, who is
charged under Section 376(2) IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
While not pressing the matter on merit, Mr. Mishra, learned counsel
for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be directed to
surrender and released on bail on any such terms and conditions as
they had been allowed to go on bail by this Court’s order dated 18th
July, 2022 in ABLAPL No.6439 of 2021. While claiming so, Mr.
Page 2 of 2
Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners produced a copy of the
said order for the Court’s perusal.
5.
Mr. Praharaj, learned counsel for the State objects to the
contention of the petitioners, however, fairly admits that both of
them had been directed to surrender before the learned Sessions
court within a stipulated time and allowed to be released on bail, a
relief which was not availed of.
6.
Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
under the circumstances narrated, the petitioners could not
surrender before the learned Sessions court as was directed by order
dated 18th July, 2022 in ABLAPL No.6439 of 2021.
7.
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for
the respective parties, the court is of the view that the petitioners in
the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case should be directed to
surrender and apply for bail and to be released subject to conditions
and accordingly, it is ordered.
8.
In the result, CRLMC stands disposed of with a direction
to the petitioners to surrender before the learned Additional
Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, (POCSCO) Act, Jeypore, Koraput
in connection with T.R. Case No.31 of 2021 corresponding to G.R.
Case No.279 of 2021 arising out of Kakiriguma P.S. Case No.22 of
2021 and in the event they surrender on or before 10th February,
2023, the court below shall release both of them on bail subject to
conditions as would be fixed by the court.
9.
A certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
Tudu