Page 1 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 36658 of 2022

Vinayak Stone Crusher, Jajpur

…..

Petitioner

Mr. M. Agarwal, Advocate

Vs.

State of Odisha and Others

…..

Opposite Parties

Mr. P.K. Muduli, AGA

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

04.01.2023

Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the notice

dated 02.03.2022 under Annexure-4 issued by the opposite party no.2.

4.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the demand

so raised against the petitioner by the authority is without following due

procedure and without complying the principles of natural justice. It is further

contended that had opportunity of hearing been given, the petitioner could have

clarified the position of demand raised against it and, as such, the same could

not have been demanded.

5.

Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for the

State-opposite parties vehemently contended that the order passed by the

authority is appealable one and, therefore, the petitioner should have prefer