JUDGEMENT

ARINDAM SINHA, J. 1. Appellant, whose marriage stood dissolved by judgment dated 5th August, 2021 of the Family Court, made ex parte against her, is aggrieved. She had applied for setting aside of the judgment. The Family Court on order dated 13th January, 2022 dismissed her application. Hence, she seeks interference in appeal in respect of both, the order and the judgment.

2. Mr. Pradhan, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant and submits, several grounds were taken in the application for setting aside the judgment made ex parte against his client. At the material time there were talks of settlement and apprehending mischief, his client did not accept the summons. It was an act of ignorance. Her learned advocate in the Family Court also took other grounds on facts. The notice was not affixed to her door and, the application for setting aside the decree was made promptly, within prescribed period of limitation. He submits further, on merits there are good grounds for reversing impugned judgment. The parties are Christian. There could not have been resort to proceeding under Special Marriage Act , 1954. The Divorce Act of 1869 is applicable. Unless there is interf