SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 9575

ORISSA HIGH COURT
ANADI CHARAN NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC(TAC) No.84 of 2015

Anadi Charan Nayk

….

Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

….

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No

ORDER

11.01.2023

04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard Mr. M.K. Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner and

Mr. N.N. Satapathy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

Department.

3. The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the

Opp. Parties to grant time bound advancement scale of pay from

16.08.1989 and accordingly to give all consequential financial and

service benefits as due and admissible.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that vide office

order dtd.20.07.1994 under Annexure-5 the services of the

Petitioner was regularized form the date of his first adhoc

appointment i.e.16.08.1984. Accordingly, it is contended that on

completion of 15 years of service on 16.08.1999 the Petitioner

became entitled to get the benefit of TBA scale of pay. When the

same was not extended in his favour th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top