SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 8906

ORISSA HIGH COURT
,
M/S KATWARI ENTERPRISES, JHARSUGUDA – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF MANAGER, UCO BANK, BRAJARAJNAGAR BRANCH – Respondent
WP(C)/31307/2022



The court recognized the petitioner's right to seek an OTS settlement and allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition to facilitate the consideration of the offer by the bank.

Headnote:

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, M/s. Katwari Enterprises, defaulted on multiple loan accounts with UCO Bank, Brajarajnagar Branch. The bank initiated recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and issued a demand notice on May 17, 2022, for an outstanding liability of Rs. 18,69,250.72 as of March 31, 2021. The bank subsequently issued a sale notice on November 8, 2022, to auction the mortgaged property on November 25, 2022.

Finding of the Court:

The court noted that the petitioner had submitted an offer for an OTS (One Time Settlement) settlement, which was pending consideration by the bank.

Issues: The petitioner challenged the sale notice dated November 8, 2022, and sought an amicable settlement under the prevailing OTS scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition in view of the offer submitted for an OTS settlement.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.31307 of 2022

M/s. Katwari Enterprises

….

Petitioner

Mr. Ansuman Bhuyan, Advocate

-versus-

Chief Manager, UCO Bank,

Brajarajnagar Branch, Dist-

Jharsuguda and Another

….

Opp. Parties

None

CORAM:

JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH

JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO

Order No.

ORDER (Oral)

02.01.2023

(Hybrid Mode)

01.

1.

The petitioner is a defaulter in many loan

accounts/facilities

availed

from

UCO

Bank,

Brajarajnagar Branch, Dist- Jharsuguda and facing

recovery process under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for

an aggregate outstanding liability of Rs.18,69,250.72

due as on 31.03.2021 i.e. the date of classification of

the accounts as NPA culminating into an issuance of

demand notice dated 17.05.2022.

2.

By filing the present Writ Petition, a challenge

has been laid to the sale notice dated 08.11.2022

putting the mortgaged property for auction sale on

25.11.2022; with further direction to the Bank for

// 2 //

Page 2 of 2

arriving at an amicable settlement under the

prevailing OTS scheme.

3.

At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the

petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the

present Writ Petition in view of offer submitted by the

petitioner

for

an

OTS

settlement

pending

consideration by the Bank.

4.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is

dismissed as withdrawn.

(Jaswant Singh)

Judge

(M.S. Sahoo)

Judge

Basudev 2nd January, 2023

Cuttack

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top