ORISSA HIGH COURT
,
M/S KATWARI ENTERPRISES, JHARSUGUDA – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF MANAGER, UCO BANK, BRAJARAJNAGAR BRANCH – Respondent
WP(C)/31307/2022
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, M/s. Katwari Enterprises, defaulted on multiple loan accounts with UCO Bank, Brajarajnagar Branch. The bank initiated recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and issued a demand notice on May 17, 2022, for an outstanding liability of Rs. 18,69,250.72 as of March 31, 2021. The bank subsequently issued a sale notice on November 8, 2022, to auction the mortgaged property on November 25, 2022.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the petitioner had submitted an offer for an OTS (One Time Settlement) settlement, which was pending consideration by the bank.
Issues: The petitioner challenged the sale notice dated November 8, 2022, and sought an amicable settlement under the prevailing OTS scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition in view of the offer submitted for an OTS settlement.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.31307 of 2022
M/s. Katwari Enterprises
….
Petitioner
Mr. Ansuman Bhuyan, Advocate
-versus-
Chief Manager, UCO Bank,
Brajarajnagar Branch, Dist-
Jharsuguda and Another
….
Opp. Parties
None
CORAM:
JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
Order No.
ORDER (Oral)
02.01.2023
(Hybrid Mode)
01.
1.
The petitioner is a defaulter in many loan
accounts/facilities
availed
from
UCO
Bank,
Brajarajnagar Branch, Dist- Jharsuguda and facing
recovery process under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for
an aggregate outstanding liability of Rs.18,69,250.72
due as on 31.03.2021 i.e. the date of classification of
the accounts as NPA culminating into an issuance of
demand notice dated 17.05.2022.
2.
By filing the present Writ Petition, a challenge
has been laid to the sale notice dated 08.11.2022
putting the mortgaged property for auction sale on
25.11.2022; with further direction to the Bank for
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
arriving at an amicable settlement under the
prevailing OTS scheme.
3.
At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the
petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the
present Writ Petition in view of offer submitted by the
petitioner
for
an
OTS
settlement
pending
consideration by the Bank.
4.
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Jaswant Singh)
Judge
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge
Basudev 2nd January, 2023
Cuttack
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.