ORISSA HIGH COURT
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra, J
NILAMADHAB MAHASETHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2972 of 2023
Nilamadhab Mahasethi
….
Petitioner
Mr. P. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. N.K. Praharaj, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER
06.02.2023
01.
1.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual
/Physical Mode).
2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
counsel for the State. Perused the record as well as documents annexed
to the writ petition.
3.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following
prayer :
“It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may be graciously pleased to admit this writ
petition, call for the records, issue rule Nisi calling upon
the Opp. Parties as to why the petitioner shall not be
granted the 3rd RACP @ 6600/- with 3% increment with
effect from 13.10.2017 as per finance department
resolution dtd. 1.1.2013 involving Rule 13(1) of ORSP
Rule, 2008 in the light of judgment of State of Odisha
vrs. Biharilal Barik in W.P.(C) No.-2831/2016 vide order
dtd. 27.6.2016.
Failing to show cause issue the writ of mandamus
directing the Oppo.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.