SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 77

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MAHUNADI – Appellant
Versus
SATYABHAMA – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK S.A. No.296 of 1998 In the matter of an appeal under Section 100 C.P.C, 1908.

***

Smt. Mahunadi @ Mahanandi @ Mahanadi Devi @ Upadhyaya (dead) & Others … Appellants.

-VERSUS-

Smt. Satyabhama Panda & Others … Respondents Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Appellants : Mr. S. Mantry, Advocate.

For the Respondents : Mr. N. Panda-1, Advocate.

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA Date of Hearing : 16.01.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 17.01.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This 2nd Appeal has been preferred against the confirming Judgment.

2. The appellant in this 2nd Appeal i.e. Mahanadi Devi was the defendant No.1 before the Trial Court in the suit vide O.S. No.15 of 1991-I and sole appellant before the 1st Appellate Court in the First Appeal vide T.A. No.14 of 1993.

The respondents in this 2nd Appeal were the plaintiffs and defendant Nos.2 to 8 before the Trial Court in the suit vide O.S. No.15 of 1991-I and respondents before the First Appellate Court in the 1st Appeal vide T.A. No.14 of 1993.

3. The suit of the plaintiffs (respondent Nos.1 to 4 in this 2nd Appeal) against the defendants (appellant and respondent No.5 to 11 in this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top