ORISSA HIGH COURT
MAHUNADI – Appellant
Versus
SATYABHAMA – Respondent
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK S.A. No.296 of 1998 In the matter of an appeal under Section 100 C.P.C, 1908.
***
Smt. Mahunadi @ Mahanandi @ Mahanadi Devi @ Upadhyaya (dead) & Others … Appellants.
-VERSUS-
Smt. Satyabhama Panda & Others … Respondents Counsel appeared for the parties:
For the Appellants : Mr. S. Mantry, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. N. Panda-1, Advocate.
P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA Date of Hearing : 16.01.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 17.01.2025
JUDGMENT
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1. This 2nd Appeal has been preferred against the confirming Judgment.
2. The appellant in this 2nd Appeal i.e. Mahanadi Devi was the defendant No.1 before the Trial Court in the suit vide O.S. No.15 of 1991-I and sole appellant before the 1st Appellate Court in the First Appeal vide T.A. No.14 of 1993.
The respondents in this 2nd Appeal were the plaintiffs and defendant Nos.2 to 8 before the Trial Court in the suit vide O.S. No.15 of 1991-I and respondents before the First Appellate Court in the 1st Appeal vide T.A. No.14 of 1993.
3. The suit of the plaintiffs (respondent Nos.1 to 4 in this 2nd Appeal) against the defendants (appellant and respondent No.5 to 11 in this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.