SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 14026

ORISSA HIGH COURT
,
DURYODHAN SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
WP(C)/36594/2022



Headnote:

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the disposal of Non Judicial Misc. Case No.2 of 2016 pending before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Talcher, arising out of L.A. Case No.73 of 2009 under Annexure-5 expeditiously.

Finding of the Court:

The Court observed that it is not inclined to issue any direction for early disposal of the matter, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the Petitioner.

Final Decision: The Court granted liberty to the Petitioner to file an application before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Talcher seeking early disposal of Non Judicial Misc. Case No.2 of 2016, which shall be considered in accordance with law.

Page 1 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 36594 of 2022

Duryodhan Sahoo & Others

…..

Petitioners

Mr.J. Dash, Advocate.

Vs.

State of Odisha & Others

…..

Opposite Parties

Mr. S. Nayak, ASC

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

10.01.2023

Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. J. Dash, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. S.

Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking direction

for disposal of Non Judicial Misc. Case No.2 of 2016 pending before the

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Talcher, arising out of L.A. Case No.73 of

2009 under Annexure-5 expeditiously.

4.

This Court is not inclined to issue any direction for early disposal of

the matter, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the Petitioner.

However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to file an application before

the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Talcher seeking early disposal of Non

Judicial Misc. Case No.2 of 2016, which shall be considered in

Page 2 of 2

accordance with law.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

Subrat

(DR. B.R. SARANGI)

JUDGE

(B. P. SATAPATHY)

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top