Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
S.K.MISHRA, J
LAKSHMAN SRINIVASAN – Appellant
Versus
REPUBLIC OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial scrutiny of seized cash legality. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments for cash release. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. opposing arguments on cash unaccountability. (Para 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 5. guidelines for handling seized property. (Para 9 , 11 , 12) |
S.S. Mishra, J.
The present Criminal Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C, 1973, [Corresponding provision- Section 442 read with Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023], assailing the order dated 14.08.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge (CBI), Court No.1 -cum-the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in Crl. Misc Case No.32 of 2024 arising out of T.R. No.03 of 2023 corresponding to CBI/SCB/Kol P.S. Case No.RC.30/S/2014-Kol dated 05.06.2014 rejecting the application filed by the petitioner U/s. 451 read with Section 457 of Cr.P.C, 1973 seeking release of cash seized by the CBI; during investigation.
2. The learned Special Judge (CBI) – Court No.1-cum- The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar, rejected the application of the petitioner seeking release of Rupees Fifteen Lakhs which was seized by CBI by the impugned order. It wi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
