SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 399

ORISSA HIGH COURT
R.VENKAT RAMANAN@R.VENKET RAMANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


G. Satapathy, J.

1. This criminal revision is directed against the impugned order dated 29.08.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ganjam at Berhampur in G.R. Case No. 225 of 2012(B) refusing to discharge the petitioner from the criminal case for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.120(B)/420/ 468/471/34 of IPC r/w. Sections 4/5/6 of Prize Chits & Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 (in short, “the Act”).

2. Briefly stated, the allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner and others by entering into conspiracy allured the informant/complainant to deposit/invest money in Right Max Techno Trade Company on the assurance of giving high returns @ Rs.1600/- per month on deposit of Rs.10,000/- up to 33 months and accordingly, received investment/deposit from the complainant/informant and other gullible investors, who invested certain amounts in the company which issued some bonds in their favour, but when the complainant/informant and other investors approached the company personnel at Berhampur Office for return of their money, no money was returned to them. On this fact, the informant and villagers approached the Police, but in vain and thereafte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top