Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Sibo Sankar Mishra, J
Chittaranjan Senapati – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha (Vigilance) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation and basis of criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims of ethical earnings disregarded. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments from vigilance department against quashing. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. concerns regarding inordinate delay and fundamental rights. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. final ruling to quash proceedings based on unjust delay. (Para 30 , 33) |
S.S. Mishra, J.
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 CrPC by the petitioner seeking quashing of the criminal proceeding arising out of Bhubaneswar Vigilance P.S. Case No.20 of 2004 corresponding to T.R. No.83 of 2007, pending before the Court of the learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar, for alleged commission of offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 .
2. Heard Ms. Subhashree Sen, learned Advocate, appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Niranjan Moharana, learned Additional Standing Counsel (Vigilance) appearing for the opposite party-State.
3. The present criminal proceeding arising out of Bhubaneswar Vigilance P.S. Case No.20 of 2004, was registered on 23.06.2004 under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1)(e) of the Prevention of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
