SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 925

ORISSA HIGH COURT
ALPHARD MARITIME LTD. – Appellant
Versus
OCEAN JADE (IMO- 9660750) – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ADMLS No.2 of 2025 ALPHARD MARITIME LTD. …. Plaintiff Mr. D.P. Nanda, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Samvit Mohanty, Advocate Mr. Anurag Pati, Advocate Mr. Adwitiya Satpathy, Advocate Ms. Jimisha Dalal, Advocate Ms. Nitansha Nema, Advocate Mr. Aryan Sharma, Advocate Ms. Shivani Das, Advocate -versus-

OCEAN JADE (IMO: …. Defendants

9660750) and another Mr. Gautam Mukherji, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. S.S. Mohanty, Advocate Ms. Arusmita Acharya, Advocate Ms. Ankita Mukherji, Advocate Mr. Amlan Mishra, Advocate Mr. S.S. Moharana, Advocate Ms. Deepsha Dhal, Advocate Mr. S.K. Padhi, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Ipsit Aurobindo Acharya, Advocate Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advocate Mr. Atul Jain, Advocate Ms. Juhi Mathur, Advocate Mr. Piyush Panda, Advocate (For intervenors)

CORAM:

JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO

ORDER

08.05.2025 (Hybrid Mode)

Order No.

12. 1. The learned senior counsel appearing for the plaintiff refers to the order dated 06.05.2025 to point that at internal page 10, in last but three lines of paragraph-5 there is a typographical error. In the last but 3rd line ‘resolved’ is to be read as ‘reserved’.

2. The word ‘resolved’ is to be corrected in the said order as indic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top