SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1414

ORISSA HIGH COURT
DEBI PRASAD GIRI – Appellant
Versus
PINKI@PRITIREKHA PARIDA@GIRI – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.372 of 2025 Debi Prasad Giri …. Petitioner Mr. Sougat Dash, Advocate -Versus-

Pinki @Pritirekha Parida @ Giri …. Opposite Party None CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER

30.04.2025 Order No.

01. 1. Heard Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. No notice is issued to the opposite parties since the matter is disposed of at the stage of admission.

3. Instant petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 14th February, 2025 passed in connection with MAT Suit No.27 of 2024 as at Annexure-4 by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Udala, Mayurbhanj, whereby, an application under Order 9 Rule 7 C.P.C. pressed into service by him seeking the ex parte order to be set aside was declined.

4. Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the opposite party, who has instituted the suit seeking dissolution of marriage and therein, on the premise that notice was served and refused by the petitioner, he was set ex parte and thereafter, the suit was posted for ex parte argument and at that stage, the application under Order 9 Rule 7 C.P.C. was filed but it has not been entert

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top