SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1955

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Gourishankar Satapathy, J
Keshab Gouda @ Gouda Keshab Bhai Kishan – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
BLAPL No.6297 of 2025|BLAPL No.7806 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P.R. Singh, Ms. Rajalaxmi Rout
For the Respondents: Mr. C. Mohanty

Bail is granted based on the presumption of innocence and the circumstances of pre-trial detention.

Headnote:The bail applications by the petitioners arise from Cuttack Cyber Crime and Economic Offence PS Case No.18 of 2025 concerning alleged cheating, with the petitioners detained since March and January 2025 respectively. The court finds no reason to deny bail, underlining the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The bail applications are consequently allowed, permitting the petitioners to secure bail on specified terms.

ORDER(ORAL)

07.08.2025 Order No

02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. Since these two bail applications arise out of one and same case record, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

3. These are the bail applications U/S.483 of BNS S by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Cuttack Cyber Crime and Economic Offence PS Case No.18 of 2025 arising out of GR Case No.226 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned JMFC(UTP), Cuttack for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 318(4)/319(2) of BNS , on the allegation of cheating a sum of Rs.15,82,000/- from the informant on the assurance of returning the amount with interest @ 0.5% per day, which would double the investment in six months.

4. Heard, Mr. Priya Ranjan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 6297 of 2025; Ms. Rajalaxmi Rout, learned counsel for the Petitioner in BLAPL No. 7806 of 2025 and Mr. C. Mohanty, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the present matter and perused the record.

5. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioners vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioners in custody since 06.03.2025(Keshab Gouda @ Gouda Keshab Bhai Kishan) and 19.01.2025 (Surendra Sahoo) with submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioner to bail.

6. Hence, the bail applications of the petitioners namely Keshab Gouda @ Gouda Keshab Bhai Kishan and Surendra Sahoo in BLAPL Nos. 6297 & 7806 of 2025 stands allowed and the petitioners are allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it.

7. Accordingly, the BLAPL Nos. 6297 and 7806 of

2025 stand disposed of.

8. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top