Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J
Mamata Bag – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. argued that statutory provisions against married daughters are unconstitutional. (Para 5) |
| 2. court's observation on application timing and legal applicability. (Para 6) |
| 3. final order to quash rejection and reconsider claim. (Para 7) |
ORDER
04.08.2025 Order No.
02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia challenging the rejection of the petitioner’s claim to get the benefit of Rehabilitation Appointment on the ground that the petitioner is the married daughter of the deceased employee and accordingly not coming within the definition of Family as provided under Rule- 2 of the OCS(R.A) Rules, 1990. It is contended that such a decision was taken relying on the provisions contained under OCS(R.A.) Amended Rules, 2020.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the deceased employee died on 10.12.2005 and petitioner being the unmarried daughter of the deceased employee made her application to get the benefit on 20.05.2006 which was duly recommended vide letter dated 31.07.2010 under Annexure-4. Subsequently, though various communicat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
