Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
K.R.MOHAPATRA, Savitri Ratho, JJ
Kalyani Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's obligation to ensure fair consideration. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 2. mandate for fresh consideration of application. (Para 10) |
ORDER
Order No. 31.07.2025
02. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Petitioner in this writ application seeks to assail order dated 15th January, 2025 (Annexure-5) passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Lower Suktel Irrigation Project, Bolangir- Opposite Party No.4 by which an application filed by the Petitioner under Section 64 (1) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for brevity “the Act”) has been rejected.
3. Mr. Satapathy, learned counsel being authorized by Mr. Sahoo, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the award was published on 26th February, 2023. The Petitioner received the compensation on protest on 29th April, 2023 and filed an application under Section 64 (1) of the Act on 24th June, 2023 to refer the matter to Authority for enhancement of the compensation and other benefits. The said application was not entertained by Special Land Acquisition Officer, Lower Suktel Irrigation Project, Bolangir- Opposite Party No.4. Hence, th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
