Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra, J
Amulya Mallik – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. argument for recalling witnesses due to unfair disadvantage. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. opposition argues against recall for the victim's dignity. (Para 6) |
| 3. court's view on the necessity of recalling witnesses for justice. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. modification of trial court’s order to allow recall of key witness. (Para 9) |
| 5. final disposal of the crlmc application. (Para 10) |
ORDER
01 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
3. By filing the present CRLMC application, the accused- Petitioner, who is in custody seeks to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash the order dated 08.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Chandikhole in C.T.(Sessions) No.296 of 2025 thereby learned trial court has rejected the application filed at the instance of the accused-Petitioner under section 311 Cr.P.C.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner at the outset contended that the occurrence is of the year 2024 and the F.I.R. was registered on 22.05.2024 for commission of an offence punishable under section 376, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He further contended that the victim herself is the informant in the present case. He fu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
