Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
K. R. Mohapatra, Savitri Ratho, JJ
Dasarathi Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. supportive comments on notice inadequacy. (Para 5) |
| 2. orders set aside for violating natural justice. (Para 6) |
| 3. court's ruling on remittance for fresh consideration. (Para 7) |
| 4. disposal of writ petition decision. (Para 8) |
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER
25.08.2025 Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
04.
2. Petitioner in this writ petition prays for the following relief:
(cid:0)‡Under this circumstance the Petitioner prays that your Lordships would be graciously pleased to admit the Wri tPetition, issue Rule NISI, calling upon the 0pp. Parties t oshow cause as to why the entire proceeding bearing GE ACase No. 27/2022 which was initiated sue moot by the Tahasildar, Hatadihi (0pp.
Party No.3) shall not b equashed .
If the Opp. Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, the said Rule may be made absolute thereby issuing a Writ of Mandamus/ Certiorari and quash the entire proceeding bearing OEA Case No. 27 of 2022 which was initiated suo moto by the Tahasildar, Hatadihi (Opp. Party No.3) and thereby reverting the land as described in Schedule-E to the original record of right.
And further be pleased to pass any other writ/wr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
