SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3159

ORISSA HIGH COURT
S.K.PANIGRAHI, J
Antaryami Sethi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
W.P.(C) No.23063 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. J. K. Digal
For the Respondents: Mr. Pravakar Behera

Submission of 50% fine payment allows for contesting the case in court.

Headnote:The Petitioner sought a direction for the acceptance of 50% of the fine under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Court noted the Petitioner must first appear before the Authority and may contest the case subsequently. The deposit of 50% was directed to allow for adjudication. The petition was ultimately disposed of.

Table of Content
1. requirement for fine deposit for proceedings. (Para 3)

01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has sought for a direction from this Court to the RTO, BBSR- 1/Opposite Party to accept 50% of the fine amount for the vehicle bearing Registration No. OD-02S-2033 (Tipper).

3. Mr. Pravakar Behera, learned Standing Counsel for Transport Department submits that in view of Sections 194 and 192 (A) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , the Petitioner is required to appear before the Authority, who has issued the VCR and pray for transmission of the record to the jurisdictional Magistrate, if he wants to contest the case. The Petitioner has not yet appeared Signature Not Verifiedbefore the authority and made such prayer. Since the Digitally Signed Page 1 of 3.

Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Challan/VCR amount in total is Rs.54,660/- (Rupees Fifty Four Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Only), the Petitioner may be directed to deposit 50% of the same and contest the case before the jurisdictional Magistrate. Hence, he prays that the Petitioner is required to produce the driving license in original of the driver of the offending vehicle for taking appropriate action.

4. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this Court directs that without prejudice to the case of either parties, in the event the Petitioner deposits 50% of the VCR/Challan amount before the concerned R.T.O. along with driving license of the driver of the offending vehicle, the eChallan/VCR shall be transmitted to the jurisdictional Magistrate for adjudication in accordance with law, if not already transmitted It is made clear that such deposit, if made, as directed above, shall be subject to the result of the adjudication to be made by the jurisdictional Magistrate.

5. So far as issuance of fitness certificate and permit is concerned, the Petitioner may apply for the same before the concerned R.T.O. by filing necessary application, which shall be considered in accordance with law.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Page 2 of 3.

Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top