Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
HARISH TANDON, CJ, M.S. RAMAN, J
Rabi Narayan Acharya – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of tender call notice questioned. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's argument regarding eligibility conditions. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's responsibility to respect tendering authority's discretion. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. judicial intervention in tenders is limited to clear abuses. (Para 7 , 9) |
ORDER
Order No. 22.08.2025
01. 1. Questioning the validity of tender call notice dated 2nd August, 2025 vide Annexure-1 issued by the Superintendent, Maharaja Krishna Chandra Gajapati Medical College Hospital, Berhampur- opposite party no.2, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this writ petition invoking provisions under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer(s):-
“It is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue rule nisi calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the aforesaid Tender Call Notice dtd.02/08/2025, issued by the O.P. No.2, under Annexure-1, shall not be set aside after declaring the same is illegal;
And in the event the opp. Parties file no show cause or file insufficient or false cause the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to make the rule nisi abs
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
