SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2981

ORISSA HIGH COURT
RATNAKAR SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28857 of 2023 In the matter of an Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 ***

Sri Ratnakar Sahoo Aged about 60 years Son of Late Shyam Sahoo At/P.O./P.S.: Rajranpur District: Nayagarh. … Petitioner.

-VERSUS-

1. State, of Odisha Represented through Principal Secretary General Administration and Public Grievance Department Lok Seva Bhawan, Bhubaneswar District: Khordha. 2. Nodal Officer Odisha Administrative Tribunal Bhubaneswar, At/P.O.: Bhubaneswar District: Khordha … Opposite parties.

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner : M/s. Sameer Kumar Das, Prakash Kumar Behera, Nirajan Jena, Advocates For the Opposite parties : Mr. Arnav Behera, Additional Standing Counsel P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Dates of Hearing : 12.09.2024 :: Date of Order : 02.01.2025

ORDER

Aggrieved by Office Order bearing No.E(ii)24/2023/ 688/OAT, dated 30.05.2023 of the Nodal Officer issued from the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar (Annexure-7) approving the pay recommended to be fixed by the Screening Committee in its proceeding dated 28.02.2023, which was held to comply with the direction con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top