SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3824

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MAMALI SAMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 21284 of 2024 Smt.Mamali Samal …. Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Kumar Panda, Advocate -Versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K.Mohanty, ASC CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER

13.01.2025 Order No.

04. 1. Heard Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohanty, learned ASC for the State.

2. In fact, Mr. Mohanty, learned ASC for the State requests for an adjournment to consider the citation in Basudev Dandasena Vrs. State of Odisha & others reported in 2010(I) OLR-909 cited by Mr.

Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and to respond.

3. A copy of the above citation is made available to the Court by Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and the same is perused. Considering the submission of Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and the case law cited above, the Court is inclined to dispose of the matter by the following order.

4. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned decision by order dated 9th August, 2024 of the Government as at Annexure-1 on the grounds stated.

5. Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is non-compliance of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top