IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV NO. 413 of 2024 Birendra Kumar Behera …. Petitioner Mr. D.P. Dhal, Senior Advocate Mr. A. Ray, Advocate -Versus-

State of Odisha …. Opposite party Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

13.11.2025 Order No.

03. 1. Heard Mr. Dhal, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Sahoo, learned ASC for the State.

2. Notice to opposite party No.2 is dispensed with as the matter is disposed of at the stage of admission.

3. Instant revision is filed by the petitioner challenging the correctness of the impugned order dated 16^th May, 2024 passed in connection with C.T. Case No. 63 of 2024 by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge-cum-FTC, Bhubaneswar, whereby, an application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. moved by him demanding discharge has been rejected.

4. Mr. Dhal, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner would submit that no any offence under Section 307 IPC is made out even by considering the materials on record and therefore, to that extent, the impugned order i.e. Annexure-4 is liable to be interfered with. It is submitted that opposite party No.2 received injuries stated to be grievous but that by itself, is not sufficient