SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 4355

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BIJAYA SABAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
ABLAPL 12821 / 2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 12821 of 2025 Bijaya Sabar …. Petitioner Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate -versus-

State of Orissa …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC ABLAPL No. 12842 of 2025

1. Saheb Mallick @ …. Petitioners Sahadev Mallick

2. Bhabani Mallick

3. Sankar Mallick

4. Jhajananda Mallick @

Nadi @ Nabi Mallick Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate -versus-

State of Orissa …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

14.11.2025 Order No.

01. 1. Since both the matte rs arise out of same F.I.R, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order on the consent of the parties.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3. The Petitioners are apprehension of incarceration in OR Case No.90JP of 2025-26 of Jagannath Prasad Range for commission of offence, inter alia, under Section 2(16)/ 9 / 39(d) / 44(1) / 49 / 49(d) / 50 punishable of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and U/s 51 of Wildlife (Protection) Act, pending in the file of the learned J.M.F.C., Jagannath Prasad.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the Petitioner in ABLAPL No.12821 of 2025 and the Petitioner in ABLAPL No.12842 of 2025 have been implicated on the basis of the co-accused statement. Hence, they may be protected by pre-

arrest bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes such prayer.

6. Taking into account the nature of allegations, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent.

7. If it comes to fore that the Petitioners have any criminal antecedents, this order shall not be given effect to.

8. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH Judge Soumya Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 15-Nov-2025 14:00:51

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top