SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 4373

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SANJIB NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
DR.KAUSALYA BEHERA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK C. M.P. No.997 of 2025 Sanjib Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate -versus-

Dr. Kausalya Behera and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. D.K. Mishra, Advocate for O.P. No.1 CORAM:

JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

06.11.2025 Order No.

04. 1. Mr. A.P. Bose, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that notice on Opposite Party No.2 has been made sufficient through the learned trial court in terms of the order dated 12.09.2025 of this Court.

2. Heard Mr. A.P. Bose, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. D.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.1.

3. Present C.M.P. is directed against order dated 18.06.2025 of the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.) (LR & LTV), Sambalpur passed in C.S. No.386 of 2015, wherein the prayer of Defendant No.8 to amend his written statement has been refused.

4. Present Petitioner is Defendant No.8 in the suit. Present Opposite Party No.1 is the Plaintiff, who filed the suit praying for partition in respect of suit schedule “A” and “B” properties. At the stage of taking of evidence from the side of the Plaintiff, Defendant No.8 sought to amend his written statement to incorporate the fact that certain properties bel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top