IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1594 of 2024 (An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Manorama Acharya @ Tripathy …. Petitioners and another -versus-

State of Odisha and Others …. Opposite Parties Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. B. Bhuyan, Advocate.

For Opposite Parties - Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel Mr. T.K. Mohanty, Advocate. CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA Date of Hearing and Judgment :06.11.2025 A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners challenging the impugned order dated 16.12.2022 (Annexure-5) passed in Consolidation Revision No.170 of 2015 by the Addl. Commissioner, Settlement & Consolidation, Board of Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack (O.P. No.2) on the ground of non-providing of opportunity of being heard to the petitioners and passing of the impugned order against the petitioners by the O.P. No.2 without complying the principles of natural justice.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the O.P. Nos.3 to 5 and learned ASC for the State.

3.