Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?

Key Points: - The High Court (Orissa) set aside the impugned order rejecting release of seized vehicle and mobile phone and remanded for reconsideration in light of Asish Ranjan Mohanty v. State of Odisha and SOP, directing reconsideration within four weeks (!) . - The appeal concerns an application under Section 503 BNSS, 2023 for release of seized mobile phone and vehicle in a case under NDPS Act, with arguments about ownership and potential use in crime (!) (!) . - The Court noted that the trial Court did not refer to the cited judgment and SOP and, accordingly, remanded to consider in light of that law (!) (!) . - The matter was heard on Hybrid Arrangement (virtual/physical) with arguments from Petitioner and State (!) (!) . - The application is disposed of with urgent certified copy issued; remand back to trial Court for reconsideration within four weeks from production of copy of the order (!) (!) . - The order was passed by Hon’ble MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA (!) . - The proceeding originates from Criminal Misc. Case No.151 of 2024 arising out of Khandagiri P.S. Case No.472/2024; offence under Section 21(b) NDPS Act (!) . - The State’s argument emphasized seriousness of offence and risk of release aiding similar offences (!) . - The Petitioner contends ownership and readiness to produce vehicle when required (!) .

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?