SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 4668

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SANGRAM KESHARI PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
SAILABALA GIRI – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMAPL No. 283 of 2025 An Application under Articles 226 & 227 of Constitution of India.

---------------

Sangram Keshari Pradhan & another ….. Petitioners - versus -

Sailabala Giri and others …... Opp. Parties Advocate(s) appeared in this case :-

_______________________________________________________

For Petitioners : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Mishra-2, Advocates.

For Opp. Parties : Mr. Vivekanand Jena, Caveator __________________________________________________________

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

ORDER

5th December, 2025 I.A. No. 498 of 2025 SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the application to restore RSA No. 235 of 2014, which was dismissed by order dated

25.11.2019 passed by this Court.

2. Office has pointed out delay of 2096 days, which is sought to be explained in this application. It is stated that after death of their father, the mother of the appellants was conducting the case and had not informed the petitioners.

After receipt of the caveat petition filed by the respondents, they searched for and contacted the conducting advocate at Cuttack on 12.09.2025 and came to know firstly, that as their moth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top