SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 4691

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MD.MOINUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
JOINT COMMNR.CONSOL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.21216 of 2013 (An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Md. Moiuddin and another …. Petitioners -versus-

Joint Commissioner, …. Opposite Parties Consolidation & Settlement, Sambalpur and Ors.

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. T. K. Mishra, Advocate.

For Opposite Parties - Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel.

Mr. B. Nayak, Advocate. {for O.P. No.3(a)}

Mr. A. Dash, Advocate. {for O.P. No.5(a) to 5(c)}

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA Date of Hearing :05.12.2025 :: Date of Judgment :05.12.2025 A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing the impugned order dated 07.07.2012 (Annexure-1) passed in R.P. No.104 of 2012 under Section 15(b) of the O.S.S. Act, 1958 by the Addl. Commissioner, Settlement & Consolidation, Sambalpur.

2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the petitioners for filing of the same is that, the predecessor of the petitioners in this writ petition i.e. Md. Kalimudin was the O.P. No.1 in the R.P. No.104

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top