ORISSA HIGH COURT
MD.MOINUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
TAHASILDAR ROURKELA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.21219 of 2013 (An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Md. Moiuddin and Another …. Petitioners -versus-
Tahasildar, Rourkela and Others …. Opposite Parties Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode):
For Petitioners - Mr. T. K. Mishra, Advocate.
For Opposite Parties - Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel.
Mr. A. Dash, Advocate.
{for O.P. Nos.4(a) to 4(c)}
Mr. B. Nayak, Advocate. {for O.P. No.2(a)}
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA Date of Hearing :05.12.2025 :: Date of Judgment :05.12.2025 A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing the impugned order dated 20.04.2013 (Annexure-1) passed in Revenue Misc. Case No.1 of 2012 by the Tahasildar, Rourkela (O.P.
No.1).
2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the petitioners for filing of the same is that, the impugned order in Revenue Misc. Case No.1 of 2012 was passed by the Tahasildar, Rourkela (O.P. No.1) on the basis of the order dated 07.07.2012 passed in R.P. No.104 of 2012 under Section 15(b) of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.