SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 4952

ORISSA HIGH COURT
CHULADHARA TANDI – Appellant
Versus
ADDL.COMMISSIONER – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK WP(C) No.22990 of 2016 An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. ***

Chuladhara Tandi & Another … Petitioners.

-VERSUS-

Addl. Commissioner, S & C, Sambalpur & Others … Opposite Parties Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioners : Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty. Standing Counsel.

(State-Opp. Parties)

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA Date of Hearing : 11.12.2025 :: Date of Judgment :11.12.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the two sons of the ailing Opp. Party in Revision Case No.798 of 2015 as her agents praying for quashing the final order dated 23.11.2015 passed in Revision Case No.798 of 2015 by the Addl. Commissioner, Settlement and Consolidation, Sambalpur on the ground that, the said Revision Case No.798 of 2015 has been allowed on dated 23.11.2015 (Annexure-1) without giving any opportunity of being heard to the Opp. Party in that Revision Case No.798 of 2015.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top