SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5143

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SRINIBAS PATRA – Appellant
Versus
MUKTIKANTA ROUTRAY – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No. 638 of 2025 Srinibas Patra …. Petitioner Mr. A. Alam, Advocate -Versus-

Muktikanta Routray …. Opposite Party CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

08.12.2025 Order No.

01. 1. Heard Mr. Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. No notice is issued to the opposite party as the same is not necessary, hence, it is dispensed with.

3. Instant revision is filed by the petitioner assailing the impugned order as at Annexure-3 passed in connection with Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 2024 by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kujang, whereby, request seeking exemption from making deposit of 20% of the compensation amount in terms of Section 148 of the N.I. Act moved by him was rejected.

4. Mr. Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not owe any liability and with such a ground, he moved the learned court below with the application i.e. Annexure-2 seeking waiver of 20% deposit but it has not entertained. The submission is that the learned court below failed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the Apex Court’s decision in Jamboo Bhandari Vrs. Madhya Pradesh State Industrial Developmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top