SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5279

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SURENDRANATH PATRO – Appellant
Versus
PRATIMA SAHU – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK SAO No.15 of 2025 Surendranath Patro …. Appellant Mr. S.S. Bhuyan, Senior Advocate -Versus-

Pratima Sahu …. Respondent None CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

12.12.2025 I.A. No.39 of 2025 Order No.

01. 1. Heard.

2. Instant IA is filed for dispensing with filing of the certified copy of the judgment and decree in RFA No.19 of

2024 for the reason stated.

3. Since the certified copy of the judgment in RFA No.19 of 2024 is filed today, the same is taken on record and as a result, the IA is disposed of.

(R.K. Pattanaik)

Judge SAO No.15 of 2025

1. Heard Mr. Bhuyan, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant.

2. No notice is issued to the respondent as the matter is disposed of at the stage of admission.

3. Instant appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) CPC assailing the impugned judgment dated 28th June, 2025 passed in connection with RFA No.19 of 2024 by the learned District Judge, Ganjam at Berhampur, whereby, the suit has been remanded back with a direction for appointment of a Survey Knowing Commissioner for demarcation of the suit schedule property and its disposal afresh and in accordance with law on the grounds inter alia that the same i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top