ORISSA HIGH COURT
SURENDRANATH PATRO – Appellant
Versus
PRATIMA SAHU – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK SAO No.15 of 2025 Surendranath Patro …. Appellant Mr. S.S. Bhuyan, Senior Advocate -Versus-
Pratima Sahu …. Respondent None CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
12.12.2025 I.A. No.39 of 2025 Order No.
01. 1. Heard.
2. Instant IA is filed for dispensing with filing of the certified copy of the judgment and decree in RFA No.19 of
2024 for the reason stated.
3. Since the certified copy of the judgment in RFA No.19 of 2024 is filed today, the same is taken on record and as a result, the IA is disposed of.
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge SAO No.15 of 2025
1. Heard Mr. Bhuyan, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant.
2. No notice is issued to the respondent as the matter is disposed of at the stage of admission.
3. Instant appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) CPC assailing the impugned judgment dated 28th June, 2025 passed in connection with RFA No.19 of 2024 by the learned District Judge, Ganjam at Berhampur, whereby, the suit has been remanded back with a direction for appointment of a Survey Knowing Commissioner for demarcation of the suit schedule property and its disposal afresh and in accordance with law on the grounds inter alia that the same i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.