SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5300

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MAMATA SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
ASWINI KUMAR SAHOO – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK WP(C) No.23655 of 2025 Mamata Sahoo ....... Petitioner -Versus-

Aswini Kumar Sahoo ....... Opposite Party For Petitioner : Mr. R. K. Nayak, Advocate For Opposite Party : Mr. A. N. Das, Advocate ----------------------------

CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Hearing & Judgment: 12.12.2025 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.K. MISHRA, J.

The present writ petition has been preferred by the Petitioner-wife, who is the Opposite Party in CP No.93 of 2019.

2. Impugned is the order dated 15.07.2025, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack, vide which her application filed under Order I, Rule 10 of the CPC, read with Section 10 of the Family Courts Act for impleading one Lopamudra Nayak as party to the said proceeding stood rejected recording the following reasons:-

“I have heard both the parties at length. Perused the records and connected materials available with it. On perusal of the petition for divorce filed by the petitioner/husband, it reveals that he has filed the petition with a prayer for dissolution of marriage dtd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top