ORISSA HIGH COURT
BRUNDABAN PANDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK WP(C) No.34622 of 2025 An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. ***
Brundaban Panda & Others … Petitioners.
-VERSUS-
State of Odisha & Others … Opposite Parties Counsel appeared for the parties:
For the Petitioners : Mr. S.P. Barik, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Ms. J. Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel.
P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA Date of Hearing : 12.12.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 12.12.2025
JUDGMENT
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1.
This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Hatadihi (O.P. No.3) to receive the deed for sale of the petitioners for registration, because, the Sub-Registrar, Hatadihi (O.P. No.3) orally refused to receive the deed for sale of the petitioners for registration. For which, without getting any way, the petitioners filed this writ petition.
2. Heard from the learned counsels of both the sides.
3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrar cannot orally refuse to receive any document/deed, when the same is presented for registration. He/she is either to register the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.